Federal Cloud ServicesTurn the next cloud question into a focused engagement—with evidence your team can review, options it can evaluate and a practical handover it can use.
Foundations establishes the broader cloud preparation strategy. Foundations Plus offers four ways to examine the decisions that need more depth. Start from your Foundations findings or bring equivalent existing strategy, scope and evidence.
Established through Foundations or equivalent existing work
Dependencies and transition choices
Architecture and operating decisions
Trust, flows and responsibilities
Evidence and AI-assisted investigation
Select one or more separately scoped modules. These are options, not four mandatory stages.
What depends on this application—and what could a change affect?
Build a clearer picture of a selected application group using approved inventory, observation evidence and owner knowledge. Separate supported relationships from assumptions and expose the gaps that matter to transition planning.
A dependency register and visual map, a coverage and blind-spot assessment, and conditional transition options with maintenance guidance.
How will cloud fit the way your organization operates?
Connect the new cloud environment to existing investments, service ownership and operating practices. Develop reference architecture options and sequence the evaluations, integrations and configuration work needed to put them into use.
Architecture options, an operating-model and service-interface package, and a prioritized implementation handover. FinOps guidance can address cost ownership, allocation and recurring review within this scope.
What must be understood before changing access and trust?
Focus on a defined service or access use case. Clarify current trust relationships, data flows, responsibilities and exceptions so the next design decision has an evidence base.
Current-state trust and flow views, a preparation gap register, policy and design options, and a proposed validation plan.
Can your operational evidence support a useful AI-assisted investigation?
Assess telemetry quality, ownership and review practices around a selected cloud-operations question. Explore incident investigation, recurring problems and cost opportunities, with focused workshops to rehearse how people would use the findings.
An evidence-readiness assessment, baseline and evaluation plan, human-review guidance and a feasibility decision. Improving the evidence—or deferring an experiment—can be the right next step.
Use existing evidence and accountable owners to define the question. Foundations is a useful starting point; purchasing it is not a prerequisite for a module.
Consider current tools, workable interim methods and future investments. Identify where acquisition, integration or configuration affects the next decision.
Receive the agreed analysis, editable records and maintenance guidance. Where included in scope, client-carried prompts help your approved AI explore the next implementation questions.
We agree the service or application boundary, available evidence, specialist participation, deliverables and acceptance criteria before work begins. Scope and timing reflect your environment and the decisions you need to make.
These are advisory and preparation engagements. Production implementation, managed operations, formal security assessment and authorization decisions require separate scope and responsible authority.
Tell us where your team is today and what it needs to decide next. We’ll discuss the appropriate starting point and scope.
Start a conversation →